Youth Climate Leader Perk Pomeyie on the Impacts of the Climate on Ghanaian Youth

23 June 2023 – by Earth Refuge Correspondent Freya Mutimer

In this enlightening interview, Perk Pomeyie (@perk_gh) shares his invaluable insights as a key figure in the Ghana Youth Environmental Movement – a youth-led environmental policy advocacy and non-violent campaign group in Ghana. Perk reflects on his firsthand experiences witnessing the devastating impacts of climate change on his homeland. He also offers his perspective on how governments can step up their efforts to address this pressing issue, as well as his personal journey of becoming an environmental activist.

Wildfires Ravage Eastern Canada Amidst Political Gridlock

bird's view of tall trees covered with smokes

13 June 2023 – By Willy Phillips

Canada is on track to have the deadliest year of fires to date, and the question of how to move forward is largely unanswered.

Eastern Canada has experienced the worst season of wildfires to date. With over 400 burns since the fire season began in May, the 43,000 sq km of burned area may only be the beginning. So far,  15,000 people have been displaced within the past two weeks, bringing the total displacements this year up to 100,000. Many more risk the same fate as fire season has just begun and extends into late October.

The atmospheric impacts of the fires have been far reaching as apocalyptic-like haze has become commonplace along the east coast, stretching 700 miles south into North Carolina. Major league baseball games, flights within the US, and many outdoor activities within this international stretch of land have been canceled or delayed as hopes for blue summer skies dwindle.

Multiple factors have contributed to these fires, mainly a buildup of dry brush within forests, a lack of controlled burns, higher-than-average temperatures, and low rainfall levels. While climate change is not entirely responsible for record-setting burns, it has played a significant role in creating ideal fire conditions, setting the scene for more devastating and uncontrollable fires. 

The United States and other countries have provided over 600 additional personnel and various resources to aid the Canadian Government. Internally, response teams are stretched to their limits as the fires crawl insidiously and sporadically along their path. Fire crews have reportedly been working 12-18 hour shifts to limit the damage done to residential and wilderness areas.

The Canadian House of Commons has been filled with intense debate and finger-pointing as a response to the fires. No consensus has been reached for a preventative solution as both sides remain in a deadlock and have passed the blame onto one another. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has publicly criticized the opposition Conservative Party for blocking progress in the climate sector. Similarly, Trudeau has been called out for his approval of new extraction plans and subsidies given to the fossil fuel industry.

While politics has clouded the situation, the need for improved fire prevention and management strategies has become apparent. For Canadian citizens, a new approach to fire management is paramount. Katrina Moser, Western University’s geography and environment department head, has made clear the answer does not lie in political blaming but rather in concrete and unifying action. “Scientists have been warning us about this for years,” said Moser. “Everybody should be working on reducing fossil fuel emissions. That’s the critical thing: these fires are telling us something. We really need to take action right now. We need to get serious about reducing fossil fuel emissions.”

Fossil Fuel Firms Owe US$23 Trillion in Climate Reparations, Says Study

9 June 2023 – by Cosmo Sanderson

Fossil fuel producers owe a staggering US$23 trillion in climate reparations, according to a new study, which argues that climate migrants should be among the first to benefit from the “tainted wealth” of the world’s largest polluters. 

Energy giants such as Saudi Aramco and ExxonMobil have for decades been “complicit” in thwarting efforts to avert climate catastrophe, the study argues. Now they have a “moral responsibility” to pay compensation to those most affected by the harm caused.  

The study says that almost a quarter of this monumental debt, US$5.4 trillion, lies at the feet of the top 21 producers, who should together pay US$209 billion a year to wipe their climate slate clean. 

The recently released study was written by Italian social scientist and professor Marco Grasso, who last year published a book on holding the oil industry to account for the climate crisis; and Richard Heede, co-founder of the US-based Climate Accountability Institute. 

The study begins by highlighting the fundamental unfairness of global warming and all of the floodingfires and famine that come with it. An estimated 92% of climate emissions come from the Global North, the study says. And the richest 1% of humanity has caused 15% of all emissions, more than double the 7% caused by the poorest half combined. 

Oil, gas and coal producers are meanwhile accused of “wilfully ignoring foreseeable climate harm,” even successfully delaying action to mitigate it through advertorials, lobbying and political donations. As such, the researchers argue, they must be “held accountable”. 

Based on a survey of 738 economists with climate expertise, the study calculates that human-caused climate change will cause US$99 trillion in damages globally between 2025 and 2050. Of this, US$70 trillion is due to fossil fuels. 

There is no “objective basis” to say who should pay this biblical climate bill between fossil fuel producers, fossil fuel emitters and political authorities, say the researchers. So they split it evenly, with each group to pay a third: US$23.3 trillion. 

Based on the historical emissions of fossil fuel producers, the researchers found that state-owned Saudi Aramco, responsible for a stunning 4.78% of global emissions, has by far the highest bill to pay: US$1.1 trillion. Rounding out the top five are ExxonMobil (US, US$478 billion), Shell (UK, US$424 billion), BP (UK, US$377 billion) and Chevron (US, US$333 billion).  

State-owned fossil fuel producers from less well-off countries, such as Russia’s Gazprom and Mexico’s Pemex, are given discounted bills. State producers in poorer countries such as India, Iran and Venezuela get a free pass entirely. 

The study does not go into detail on who should receive the money, but says that it should “compensate subjects more vulnerable to climate harm such as climate migrants and refugees, Indigenous peoples, racial and ethnic minority communities, people with disabilities, and people who are socially and economically disadvantaged.”

Shell issued a statement saying that the energy system is a result of “society’s choices” over many decades and that “everyone has a role to play” in addressing climate change. “For our part, we are reducing our own emissions and working closely with our customers to help them reduce theirs.”

Kristin Casper, General Counsel at Greenpeace International, said that fossil fuel companies must now “stop drilling and start paying”. 

Bonaire’s Residents To Launch Legal Action Against The Netherlands

boats on river between trees during daytime

4 June 2023 – by Darina Kalamova

Bonaire is an island located in the southern Caribbean Sea. Due to its small size and low elevation, it is highly susceptible to the negative effects of climate change. These effects encompass flooding, intense rainfall, prolonged periods of high temperatures, as well as the degradation and potential loss of coral reefs.

The Report

In 2022, a shocking study, outlining climate change’s effect on the island, was published. The report revealed how climate-related issues are already impacting the everyday experiences of individuals residing in the Caribbean region and what could happen in the near future if immediate action is not taken. 

Legal Action  

The island became a special Dutch municipality in 2010 and since then the Dutch government has been responsible for implementing any climate measures.

As a result of this and the study from 2022, a group of Bonaire inhabitants,  together with Greenpeace,  has launched legal action against the Dutch government, claiming that it has neglected its duty to safeguard the island against the impacts of climate change.

Citizens fear that climate change will have disastrous consequences for the island’s unique flora and fauna, their health, and livelihoods. The plaintiffs emphasized that the Dutch government should speed up its work on limiting global warming below 1.5 degrees and that emissions from the Netherlands should be reduced to zero by 2040

This is not only due to the significant CO2 emissions originating from the European Netherlands, but also because the residents of Bonaire are Dutch citizens, who should be treated as such.  For example, according to Faiza Oulahsen, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace, there are standards against flood risks, dykes, and a lot of policies in the European Netherlands that do not exist in Bonaire.

Government’s Response

As a response, the Dutch government put up a statement pledging to accelerate its efforts. In addition, it recently announced that it would increase its funding to make it easier for the island to access existing energy transition and economic subsidies. However, if the Dutch government does not come up with a long-term solution, the plaintiffs are planning on filing a formal legal challenge and standing trial. The government is given until the end of September to come up with a plan of action. 

A Global Movement For Climate Justice

The Bonaire climate case is part of a global movement for climate justice, spearheaded by coastal and island residents, who despite contributing the least to the climate crisis, are disproportionately bearing the brunt of its effects.  

EPA Power Diminished in Supreme Court Ruling

blue and white boat on water under white clouds and blue sky during daytime

2 June 2023 – by Willy Phillips

This post covers the recent Supreme Court ruling which limits power of the EPA to regulate water pollution.

In a 5-4 decision last week, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled to limit the power of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in policing water pollution via the Clean Water Act. This decision limits the power of the EPA to set regulations and has raised concerns about the potential risks to valuable ecosystems and national water quality.

The ruling, which stemmed from the Sackett V EPA case in Montana, has narrowed the EPA’s jurisdiction to regulate pollution in wetlands. According to the Supreme Court, the EPA overstepped its authority by expanding the “waters of the United States” definition under the Clean Water Act which was established over 50 years ago. The court’s majority opinion argued that the EPA’s broad interpretation of this term encompassed bodies of water that did not fall within the scope of federal regulation.

Wetlands play a crucial role in supporting diverse ecosystems, acting as natural filters for water, and providing habitat for numerous plant and animal species. This ruling has raised concerns that the reduced authority of the EPA to regulate wetlands could lead to increased pollution and degradation of these valuable ecosystems. Without robust federal oversight, wetlands and their associated ecosystems may be vulnerable to harmful practices such as industrial pollution and unregulated development.

The Supreme Court’s decision has created a fragmented regulatory framework across states. Unlike state lines, wetlands do not have clear borders. As a result, states may adopt varying standards and regulations, creating inconsistencies and gaps in environmental protection, further complicating national efforts to address pollution. Acting as a new precedent, more cases challenging EPA jurisdiction are sure to arise. 

Environmentalists and conservationists have expressed concern about the ruling, highlighting the potential consequences for water quality and biodiversity. They argue that wetlands are vital for maintaining the balance of ecosystems, protecting against floods, and supporting wildlife populations. Justice Elena Kagan led the dissenting opinion, stating the court has unjustly positioned itself as the “national decision-maker on environmental policy.” 

This decision highlights questions about the balance between environmental protection and property rights. Critics of expansive EPA regulations argue that they impose unnecessary burdens on landowners, limiting their ability to utilize their properties for economic purposes. Meanwhile, proponents of the regulations argue environmental matters are the responsibility of the EPA and not the Supreme Court. The ruling essentially reflects a judicial attempt to balance protecting the environment and respecting individual property rights, of which the implications are yet to be realized.

Global Warming Will Push Billions Into Dangerous Heat

A Saguaro cactus at sunrise

2 June 2023 – by Cosmo Sanderson

Global warming will soon push billions of people into living in “unprecedented” heat that threatens human survival, according to new research, with entire countries becoming dangerously hot. 

Various models used by the researchers found that as many as two billion people could be living in dangerously hot conditions by 2070 – just 37 years from now. 

While some of those models were upper estimates, even if the world continues warming at its current rate, two billion people will be left in dangerous heat by the end of the century.

“For every 0.1°C of warming above present levels, about 140 million more people will be exposed to dangerous heat,” said University of Exeter professor Tim Lenton, one of the leaders of the research.

“This reveals both the scale of the problem and the importance of decisive action to reduce carbon emissions.”

Limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels – the goal set out in the Paris Agreement – rather than the 2.7°C that the world is on a path to reach would mean “five times fewer people in 2100 being exposed to dangerous heat,” says Lenton. 

Another lead researcher, Professor Marten Scheffer at Wageningen University in the Netherlands, said that the rising temperatures could lead “a billion or so” people to consider migrating to cooler places. 

The study, published in May, is said to be the first of its kind to treat all humans equally. Until now, research has calculated harm caused by the climate crisis in monetary terms – with rich people having more to lose. Research has also typically valued those living now more highly than those living in the future.

“This is unethical,” says the study. “When life or health are at stake, all people should be considered equal, whether rich or poor, alive or yet to be born.”

The study identified the “climate niche” in which most humans exist, with the majority of humans living in average temperatures around two peaks of 13°C or 27°C.

Very few people have historically lived in average temperatures of 29°C or above, which is what the study defined as the upper limit for humans’ climate niche. Living in such temperatures increases deaths, migration and conflict – among a raft of other bad side effects. 

A figure from the study

The study estimates that global warming has to date pushed more than 600 million people outside the temperature niche.

India and Nigeria are already showing “hotspots” of increased exposure to extreme heat. At the current rate of warming, it is predicted that India will have 600 million people and Nigeria 300 million people living outside of the niche by 2070. 

By that time some entire countries, including Burkina Faso and Mali, will be exposed to average temperatures of 29°C or above. 

Worst-case scenarios of around 3.6 °C or even 4.4 °C global warming could put half of the world population outside the niche by the end of the century, which the study says poses an “existential risk” to humanity. 

The study did not consider exposure to other sources of climate harm, including sea-level rise, which United Nations secretary general António Guterres recently warned could lead to migration on a “biblical” scale.