Priscilla shares her valuable insights into climate change from a tech perspective. As a resident of California, she has also been “woken up year after year with ash on her sinks and smoke in the air”. The number of dry, warm and windy autumn days – which are ideal conditions for wildfires – in California has more than doubled since the 1980s. More than half of the acres burned each year in the western US can be attributed to climate change.
Researcher Jake Meyers discusses the importance of narratives in addressing the local impacts of climate change. From rural-urban migration in Kenya to floating villages of Cambodia, Jake has seen first hand how a well-constructed narrative can change environmental policy for the better.
Based on Dr. Islam’s PhD in Climate Change, Migration and Conflict, and his field work experiences, he shares some of the causes and dangers of climate-induced displacement. Using the Chattagong Hill Tracts as a case study, he leads us through the factors he deems most important based on his findings, and the consequences that climate migration has had on communities in Bangladesh.
In the following interview, Earth Refuge Correspondent James from Lake Tahoe, California discusses his experience fighting California wildfires in a warming climate and the threat of migration.
In the following interview, conducted by James Sedlack, Maura discusses her experience dealing with coastal flooding, public works issues, and questions of migration as former mayor and long-term resident of Mastic Beach, NY, a small coastal town on Long Island. For more perspective on Maura’s story, please see her short film with The Nature Conservancy on Long Island water quality.
12 February 2021 – submitted by Earth Refuge Correspondent Aubrey Calaway
Cambodian tour guide Chem Vichhai talks with Aubrey Calaway about extreme weather and ailing ecosystems in his home providence of Siem Reap. Taking us inside different stops on his tour, Vichhai describes how local residents of the Prek Toal Floating Village community- and Cambodia as a whole- are struggling to adapt to a changing climate.
What is your name and where in the world do you call home?
My name is Chem Vichhai and I am from Siem Reap, Cambodia. Right now, I am living in Battambang province with my parents, which is my hometown. I moved from Siem Reap-Battambang because of Covid-19.
What kind of work do you do? And what inspired you to pursue this career?
I am an English-Speaking Tour Guide. I chose this career because I love to speak the English language and want to share the beautiful culture, history, and custom of my country to all the people around the world who come to Cambodia. Besides that, I can meet people from other countries and learn about their country too.
Have you noticed any changes in your local environment, like temperature or weather?
Yes, I have noticed some changes in my local environment. First of all, the temperature has changed every year. Cambodia is a hot country all year ‘round- everybody can usually adapt and get used to it. But for years and years the temperature has been increasing.
In 2019 it was a very hot year because Cambodia got less rain. Normally we get rain in late June until the end of October, which is the rainy season. November to May is the dry season with no rain. But in 2019, it rained very little and made it hard for people in Cambodia to live and farm. The weather is so hot in the dry season (up to 40 C). Some places have no water for use. I think this is unusual if I compare to last year when we got a lot of rain.
2020 is a bad year besides the corona virus. Cambodia is affected by nature too. During the rainy season Cambodia got a huge flood, and it flooded almost the whole country. All farming is gone, especially rice farming.
Do you think these changes are related to climate change?
Yes, looking at all of this, I think the climate is changing because people don’t care about the environment. These changes were a sudden shock to the people in Cambodia.
Have these changes affected your life?
This change has really affected my life. It makes it difficult to work. It is so hot in dry season and all my farming was destroyed by water in the wet season. It is hard to get income to support my family, and sometimes I got sick or dizzy when I work because of heat and high humidity. I do not sleep well during nighttime because of the temperature.
And right now, there are no tourists because of Covid.
Have you been able to adapt?
I have been able to adopt but it is not so easy. Others, [especially] older people, have a big problem with this change.
Can you tell me about one or two of the places where you take tourists?
Angkor Wat Temple is the biggest Hindu temple in the world and a beautiful place for people to visit during their vacation. Angkor Wat was built in the jungle and surrounded by massive moat. On the way to go to see this temple, we can enjoy the big trees that flank the road and [provide] nice shade for people. Can see monkey, bird and other animals too. So, when we arrive inside the temple, everybody feels like they arrived to the heavens or home of God because it is so peaceful.
I also take tourists to Prek Toal Floating Village. This place is so beautiful. Most tourists go this place because they wanted to see the big freshwater lake and watching the beautiful birds, swamp forest, and the floating houses where the local people live. This trip focused on nature and real life of Khmer.
How is the environment important in your work?
If the environment is terrible, I think no tourist will come to my country, so I have no job too. Without the environment, with dirty water, and other things affecting the birds, trees, and fishes, I will find it difficult to work with tourist and just to live myself as well. So, the environment is really important to my work and people in my country.
Are there any communities where you take tour groups that are being affected by changes in the climate or environment?
Yes, there are, including the Prek Toal Floating Village community When climate change happens, it becomes more difficult for people living in their floating village because their lives focus on nature and the environment.
[For] some years people have a hard time finding the fish for consumption because there’s less water. Fish are very important for people who are living in the village. Forest fire also occurred during the dry season and killed animals, birds, and fish that lost their habitat. The people have no land for farming.
Trees are also cut down by people or destroyed by fire, so now there are not so many big trees for connecting their [floating] houses. Without big trees close by, there is no mooring to connect their house and control it from moving when there is a lot of water or wind.
How are people in these communities adapting to these changes?
Even as the climate changes and it makes it difficult for people living in the floating house, the people still stay there and try to adapt to the situation because most of them have no other place to go or live. They try to catch the fish when the water goes down and process it by smoking or drying the fish in order to keep it a long time and eat it later when they can’t find more. Sometimes they plant the vegetables on the floating garden for cooking instead of buying from market.
Some people work as a boat driver or fish worker and other jobs in the village to get some income to support their family. But some people will migrate to the mainland to find a job if there is no food to eat in the village.
Do they receive any support from aid organizations, the government, or others?
Some received support from NGOs and the government, but not everybody. And it is not every month, only something like on time per year or two years.
In your opinion, is there enough work being done to minimize the climate-related issues you’re seeing on the ground?
In my opinion, not enough. In Cambodia, mostly the people don’t care about the environment. They care only about their family. Education is still poor in Cambodia.
I think it will affect things long-term if the people do not protect the environment together. If things do not change, it will impact Cambodia as a whole. People will live and die by climate change one day.
Paulo Ricardo is a Brazilian activist who holds as his mission to make environmental justice a reality in all societal, governmental and institutional spheres. Paulo is the Climate Group coordinator at Engajamundo, an NGO created by young people who believe in their responsibility as a key part of the solution when it comes to tackling the greatest social and environmental crises our world is faced with. A central objective of Engajamundo is to empower and educate the Brazilian youth in the face of environmental and social issues. Engajamundo is built on four pillars: education, advocacy, mobilisation and civic participation, expanding on five work groups, which focus on Climate, the SDGs (UN Sustainable Goals), Gender, Biodiversity and Sustainable Cities , respectively. This is a highly effective approach as one cannot speak about climate change mitigation without addressing, for instance, how climate change aggravates gender inequality.
Engajamundo has been an active organisation in multiple United Nations Climate Change Conferences. The diversity brought by Engajamundo to these conferences acts as a channel fostering an intersectional and inclusive environmental movement. What is often overlooked is the vast array of challenges that NGOs such as Engajamundo are faced with when accessing these international spaces. Following the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, Brazil became a leading actor driving environmental protection efforts. Nevertheless, under the present Bolsonaro government, certain privileges awarded to non-governmental organisations, such as credentials to attend the UN Conferences of Parties (hereinafter COPs), were removed, thus hindering the representation of relevant groups in international conferences and consequently silencing the voices of the communities most affected by climate change. Paulo explains how, beyond the lack of governmental support, another challenge relates to the financial barriers imposed on organisations from the Global South: even though Engajamundo is the leading youth climate organisations in Brazil, the lack of resources impedes the representatives of this NGO to have a seat at the table in these high-level conferences that so greatly impact decision-making. This is a contrasting (and devastating) reality compared to the easier access to these conferences enjoyed by Global North activists, which further accentuates how these events tend to be inordinately influenced by the elites.
Additional challenges are found in the realm of language barriers: Brazil is the only country in Latin America that has portuguese as its official language, therefore indigenous peoples and other ethinic/racial minorities struggle to be able to speak on behalf of their communities as access to the English language is virtually reserved for the wealthy parts of Brazilian society. An important objective of Engajamundo is to open spaces for people with these language barriers to be able engage in environmental decision-making, thus striving to make the movement more accessible, intersectional and balanced. Engajamundo translates the jargon of what is decided in these conferences in order for the general public to actively participate in climate change mitigation efforts, given that for decades the environmental movement has been a distant one predominantly embraced by the elitist categories of society, consequently neglecting the experiences and rights of marginalised communities, reflecting the imbalance of power of the global structure.
Mainstream environmentalism remains strongly white and middle/upper-class in character, it has therefore excluded the experiences and rights of people of colour. Herein lies the weakness of the environmental movement: it traditionally seeks solutions “from the very demographic that is most complicit with causing and benefiting from exploitation and environmental degradation”. A widespread misconception has been that environmental protection has been primarily driven by Western activists. In 2018, youth climate activism gathered “momentum” through Fridays for Future , founded by Greta Thunberg. Albeit being an important part of climate activism, the media has terribly misconceived this movement as the first of its kind.
Youth climate advocacy and action for change in different corners of the world have taken place for decades, nevertheless, these remain invisible. We must not fail to point out that the immense spotlight placed on Greta has been a result of her privilege as a white person from Europe, which Paulo has discussed with Greta herself. Her achievements are honourable and have certainly helped in consolidating the movement, nevertheless , it is crucial to highlight that in countries such as Brazil, grass-roots organisations, especially those that are youth-led and/or led by vulnerable groups most affected by the climate crisis, have been actively engaging in the fight against the environmental crisis for decades yet have received no such recognition.
The voices of environmental activists from the Global South have been blatantly silenced by systemic racism. An abysmal example of racism took place during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland: Ugandan climate activist Vanessa Nakate gave a conference alongside fellow climate advocates Loukina Tille, Luisa Neubauer, Greta Thunberg, and Isabelle Axelsson. Nakate, the only activist representing the Global South, was however removed from a photo taken of the group, which sparked fierce debate over race and media representation. “Her voice is just as, if not more, valuable than ours in a place like this” , wrote Axelsson. Nakate has stated that this racist act performed by Associated Press, represented the erasure of the continent, as “Africa is the least emitter of carbons, but we are the most affected by the climate crisis…You erasing our voices won’t change anything. You erasing our stories won’t change anything.” Founder of Rise Up Climate Movement , which aims to amplify the voices of activists from Africa and spearheading the campaign to save Congo’s rainforest, which is facing massive deforestation, Nakate has been a leading activist not only in her country but in the continent as a whole, and regrettably the reason which brought her visibility was this instance of flagrant racism and discrimination. Paulo stresses that the BIPOC community has been at the forefront of the fight against climate change long before the movement gained prominence, yet they are made invisible and virtually excluded from decision making, in addition to being stripped from their achievements as they are constantly “measured” against white activists.
The environmental movement has a long-standing, uneasy relationship with racial politics. “There’s a level of racism in the movement itself, where some folks think that talking about these issues is a distraction,” said Jacqueline Patterson, director of the NAACP Environmental and Climate Justice Program . The racism and implicit bias is evident within environmentalism, therefore elevating racial justice within the movement has been a constant struggle, despite the scientific evidence that demonstrates that racial and ethnic minorities are the communities most at risk from climate change. The year of 2020 brought to the fore a reality that has burdened the BIPOC community around the globe: that of environmental racism . Paulo sheds light on the disproportionate impacts of climate change on people living in slums, people living far away from the urban cores, the indigenous tribes, and other marginalised communities. Communities that unjustly carry the burden of discrimation and racism are further impacted by climate change as governments do not comply with their international obligations to respect and safeguard basic fundamental rights. In the USA, for instance, over 14,3 million people of colour live in areas under high levels of pollution due to decades of residential segregation and racial injustice. In Brazil, the issue of environmental racism is even further aggravated as the country is governed by politicians who, like the Minister of Foreign Affairs, believe that climate change is a Marxist plot, proving how this is a negationist and negligent government. The most striking example of environmental racism in Brazil is the lack of basic sanitation, which, albeit being a right guaranteed by the Constitution and defined by law, disproportionately impacts neighbourhoods of people of colour.
It is important to highlight how the government itself has launched attacks on the environment, for instance, Brazilian Minister of the Environment Ricardo Salles called for environmental deregulation while public was “distracted” by COVID-19, which was condemned by Greenpeace Brasil spokeswoman Luiza Lima stating that “ Salles believes that people dying in line at hospitals is a good opportunity to move forward on his anti-environmental project .” Alarmingly, the government froze two initiatives targeting environmental protection, namely, the Fundo Clima (Climate Fund) and Fundo Amazônia (Amazon Fund). Therefore, in June 2020, three legal actions were brought against Bolsonaro’s government by, inter alia , Greenpeace and the Brazilian Association of Members of the Ministry of the Environment. Top level politicians propagate a discourse that is contrary to the environmental protection agenda. According to Tica Minami, Brasil’s Greenpeace Programme Director, “this is a government that neglects its role in protecting the rainforest, as it incentivises deforestation. As a result, destruction levels, criminality and violence have exploded in the Amazon”, increasing Brazilian emissions and breaching the human rights of the indigenous communities living in the rainforest. Engajamundo diligently works towards changing this reality as its representatives lobby for environmental justice, by bringing climate litigation strategies. Paulo concluded the interview speaking about how Brazilian climate activists engage in this fight against climate change on the basis of their need to survive. As emphasised by Paulo, “a luta pela justiça nunca pode parar ” (the struggle for justice must never stop): climate justice will never be achieved in a world that is deprived of racial and ethnic justice, therefore it is imperative to uplift the voices of BIPOC activists and amplify their narratives, as they are key to solving the environmental crisis.
This interview was conducted by E&U For the Climate in collaboration with Human Rights Pulse and Earth Refuge during January 2021, a month dedicated to Environmental Justice and Human Rights.
Sign up to our Earth Refuge newsletter for the latest updates on climate change, environmental justice and migration!
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy