Climate displacement in the UK: Hemsby’s coastline on the edge  

15 October 2025 – by Yumna Kamel

Simon Measures, of the Save Hemsby Coastline campaign.
Photo by Yumna Kamel / Earth Refuge

In August 2025, I was invited by Simon Measures, Chairman of the Save Hemsby Coastline (SHC) campaign, to visit the small coastal village of Hemsby in Norfolk to get an understanding of the scale of coastal erosion, and the resulting displacement of the community. Simon has spent years campaigning for meaningful action to protect this community: rallying residents, petitioning politicians, using his own two hands to clear debris and build coastal defences, and speaking out about the reality of living on a coastline that is disappearing beneath their feet.

SHC is a volunteer-led charity formed by local residents determined to defend their homes and raise awareness of the escalating coastal erosion crisis. SHC has challenged the UK government’s climate adaptation plan in UK courts, and with support from Friends of the Earth and local campaigner Kevin Jordan, has now taken a landmark case to the European Court of Human Rights over the state’s failure to safeguard coastal communities

This is not a slow-moving environmental issue; it’s an immediate emergency. I was told that, in Hemsby, time is measured not in years, but by storms.

With its arcades, fish-and-chip shops, and a funfair in the village centre, Hemsby is the kind of seaside spot that stirs nostalgia for British summers gone by. It is not lost on me, or on Simon, that Hemsby is not the sort of place that one calls to mind when asked to picture a “climate refugee”. It is a predominantly white, English, coastal town.

But walk just a few hundred metres towards the sea, and the illusion shatters.

40 cm of the cliffs disappeared overnight. Photo by Yumna Kamel/Earth Refuge.

That morning, I learned that the cliffs had eroded by 40 centimetres overnight. Forty centimetres, gone before breakfast. The scale and speed of Hemsby’s coastal loss are staggering. The North Sea is advancing relentlessly, and the community that has lived on this fragile edge for generations is fighting to keep its footing.

This blog seeks to bring awareness to the damage in Hemsby – to the coastline, to its people – and to the recent developments that threaten to accelerate the erosion of both land and community. I hope it helps people understand what’s at stake, and how they can stand in solidarity.

Walking the edge

The site of a collapsed road, which no longer exists. Photo by Yumna Kamel/Earth Refuge.

Simon led me along the beach to the south of the village, where the scale of erosion is shocking. Entire stretches of sand dunes have collapsed, leaving gaping sand cliffs that crumble at the lightest touch. Wooden staircases, which just two years ago you could walk down to reach the water, now hang mid-air, leading nowhere.

Further along stand the remnants of homes: now demolished, leaving just the remains of people’s lives. Simon shared that the people – friends and neighbours – who lived in those homes were given barely any time to pack up their lives and go elsewhere.

In 2023 alone, five to seven houses were lost in a single night. The council frames such actions in terms of safety, but locals shared that they see something far starker: erasure. Once homes vanish, they’re erased for good – and with them, the histories, memories and neighbourhood ties they held.

Just this week, more homeowners have been informed by the council that their homes are soon to be demolished. Simon has said that the homes may have held out longer, but the council decided it was safer to take them down.

The trauma of abrupt relocation is deep. Some residents have lived in Hemsby all their lives; others spent decades saving to retire here. Many have no way to secure a new mortgage or find affordable housing elsewhere. Relocation plans rarely factor in the reliance on community support and mutual aid networks, making vulnerable people even more isolated. As neighbours disperse, the ties that held people together fray, and many find it difficult to remain in touch.

Living with the consequences

A home – bearing signs of damage from storms – which is still inhabited. Photo by Yumna Kamel/Earth Refuge.

The physical and emotional burden of coastal erosion on residents is immense. They are not simply losing roofs over their heads; they are losing their sense of grounding.

Isolation compounds mental health strain. Particularly for older residents, disappearing roads and imminent displacement worsen anxiety and deepen loneliness.

The erosion has alarming physical and public health consequences too. As infrastructure crumbles, basic home necessities vanish. Due to disconnection as the result of loss of roads, some households have had to forego plumbing and are made to manage and empty their own cesspits. As a result, and for the sake of hygiene and safety, several families instead make trips into the village to use public toilets which may or may not be open at various times of day or night. It’s humiliating and risky, especially in poor weather or for those with mobility issues.

Yet even amidst this, a spirit of community endures. Neighbours support each other. In conversations, Simon recounted how community members try to uplift one another both at times of crisis (by driving to the scene of destruction to clear the damage of a collapsed road with their own hands, or the local publican opening up her pub for the community to huddle in and weather a storm), and in the small daily moments, too. He shared that his goal is to leave whoever he meets happier than when he first bumped into them.

Tourism is a double-edged sword

Hemsby’s summer fun fair. Photo by Yumna Kamel/Earth Refuge.

Hemsby’s charm – its beautiful beach, its arcades and funfairs – draws thousands of tourists every summer. That influx is vital to the local economy, contributing roughly £88–£90 million a year to Norfolk County, but it also tangibly worsens the severity of what’s happening.

Tourists often disregard erosion warnings: they walk across fragile dunes, trample protective vegetation, ignore danger signs, leave litter, and sometimes venture into areas blocked off for safety. These actions accelerate the damage. Some wander too close to unstable cliffs and debris, risking severe injury – all while the nearest main hospital, James Paget, is about a 12-mile drive away in Great Yarmouth.

A danger sign. Photo by Yumna Kamel/Earth Refuge.

So, tourism has become both Hemsby’s lifeline and its curse: essential for income, yet actively hastening its destruction.

When we paused for a tea break, a curious tourist approached us. She told us she has been visiting Hemsby for years, and over time has watched the coastline recede dramatically – confirming to us that even outsiders can see what locals have known all along.

Coastal erosion is not a priority

Hemsby beach, featuring metallic debris and litter. Photo by Yumna Kamel/Earth Refuge.

Hemsby’s struggle is magnified by national priorities and blunt policy frameworks. Simon explained that, across the UK, the focus remains almost exclusively on flooding. Ministers have visited and presided over consultations that SHC actively participated in – and even then, the resulting publications centred upon flood risk, with scant meaningful mention of coastal erosion.

Much of Norfolk lies less than one metre above sea level, yet funding for coastal defence is patchy and episodic. Simon pointed out that, by contrast, the Dutch, with around 450 kilometres of coastline, operate under a national strategy for erosion management. The Dutch agenda shows that proactive, coordinated coastal defence can be achieved. For instance, sand replenishment is used, with about 12 million m3 of sand deposited yearly on the beaches and below the waterline in front of the coast. In the UK, thousands of miles of coastline – regardless of the Coastline Paradox, which asserts that “length” is not a well-defined measurement for complex natural shapes like coastlines – fall under a fragmented array of local committees and funding programmes. The difference in approach is stark.

A new blow for residents

Hemsby’s people now face a fresh challenge from their own local authority. The council recently announced plans to dismantle the few remaining coastal defences, and to identify further homes for demolition – a decision widely described by the community as a “kick in the teeth”.

The council frames this move as a matter of public safety, but many locals see it as damage control: avoiding bad publicity rather than protecting people. One homeowner, Kevin Jordan, had his house demolished two years ago under the banner of safety; today, the perimeter still stands, suggesting he might have remained in Hemsby if given the chance.

Each demolition further fractures Hemsby’s future. The council’s compensation scheme – offering modest payments tied to lost planning rights – provides no realistic path forward. Most people who live in Hemsby are retirees or live on fixed incomes, which poses the question: how could they afford to buy or build somewhere new? According to Simon, some still live in B&Bs years later. This isn’t just short-sighted; it’s deeply unfair.

Hemsby’s story is one of multiple crises converging:

  • Rapid coastal erosion, reshaping land overnight
  • Mental and physical health strain from continual fear, loss, and deteriorating living conditions
  • Tourism’s double edge: vital to the economy yet worsening the damage
  • Policy neglect, with coastal erosion sidelined in national climate strategy

What you can do

The people of Hemsby, led by Simon and SHC, are doing all they can — but they cannot hold the line alone. SHC continues to campaign tirelessly to secure funding for its legal fees, rebuild defences and bring national attention to the overlooked crisis of coastal erosion.

When I asked Simon what people beyond Hemsby could do, he was emphatic: make as much noise as possible. Hemsby sees itself as the canary in the coalmine for other coastal communities in the UK that will soon face this battle.

You can support Save Hemsby Coastline campaign by:

  • Sharing the stories of individual residents, as well as of the community as a whole
  • Becoming a member of their campaign (for free) to show that there is power in numbers
  • Donating to the Save Hemsby Coastline campaign to help to cover the various costs of the community’s legal challenges, as well as to support their advocacy and community coastal defence initiatives
  • Contacting your local MPs and councillors to raise awareness for coastal erosion in the UK, highlighting the challenges faced by Hemsby’s residents

Because if Hemsby falls, others will follow, and the tide will not wait for politics to catch up.

EVENT: Climate Law Conference – 27 October 2025

International Protection in the Context of the Climate Crisis: Legal Strategies for UK Practice and Policy

A practical, solutions-focused conference focusing on the protection of people displaced in the context of the climate crisis

Date:
27 October, 2025

Time:
1:00 PM

Location:
DLA Piper, 160 Aldersgate St, Barbican, London EC1A 4HT

We at Earth Refuge in partnership with Refugee Legal Support and DLA Piper, and with support from UNHCR, Doughty Street Chambers,  ILPA, Refugee Law Initiative, and Climate and Migration Coalition, are pleased to confirm a half-day conference to be hosted on 27th October 2025 at DLA Piper in London.

This free, in-person gathering will bring together legal practitioners, advocates, academics, and policy experts to explore:

  • Strengthening legal capacity to advocate for the protection of persons displaced across borders in the context of the climate crisis
  • Bridging the gap between academic insight and practical application
  • Advancing a rights-based narrative for protection within existing and emerging legal frameworks

We hope you’ll join us!

Reconnecting With Us

2 September 2025 – The Earth Refuge Team

Since our founding in 2020, we have been laying the groundwork to develop solutions shaped by, and for, the individuals and communities most affected by the climate crisis.

We have always believed that effective legal solutions must be grounded in the lived realities and responsive to the needs of those most impacted. Today, that belief is taking clearer and more intentional shape in practice.

As we step into our next chapter with renewed clarity and purpose, Earth Refuge is evolving into what it was always meant to be: a collaborative platform where communities co-architect practical legal tools for navigating what is arguably the most existential reckoning of our time.

We remain guided by our core values and our unwavering commitment to climate justice, focusing on what matters most: equipping those most impacted with the legal knowledge and resources they need to create meaningful and long-lasting change.

Our work is taking root in many ways.

We support legal research by working on active cases where climate change affects human mobility, bridging legal frameworks with lived experience. Working in solidarity with affected communities, NGOs, and legal networks, we turn research into real change through legal support, policy work, and future social impact litigation.

Recognising the vital role of education, we partner with universities worldwide to educate the next generation of lawyers, offering practical learning opportunities and fostering collaborative problem-solving.

As we grow, we are bringing arts and culture into our work to engage our community – and particularly grassroots groups – in new ways. We seek to create inclusive spaces for learning, reflection, and connection.

We’re excited to share some of the key ways you can engage with our work:

Browse a collection of essential resources that shed light on climate displacement, legal responses, and community-led actions.

Explore and contribute to a growing, collaborative database tracking legal decisions related to climate (im)mobility.

Whether online or in person, our training and workshop sessions focus on the legal landscape of climate (im)mobility and are designed for grassroots groups, students, and practitioners alike.

If you’re interested in joining or co-hosting a workshop, please reach out to us at [email protected].

Stay connected

To ensure that you are up to date with our latest resources, events, and opportunities to get involved, follow us on social media and sign up for our newsletter.

Follow us here:

We’re so glad you’re here, and grateful to have you with us as we build — together.

In solidarity,

The Earth Refuge Team

What these three landmark climate cases mean for displaced communities

20 August 2025 – by Yumna Kamel

The climate justice movement has scored several landmark legal milestones. From the Hague to San José to Cairns, courts and communities are staking claims about what states owe their people in a rapidly warming world. Though each case speaks in the language of law, the underlying question is both human and existential: what duties do states owe to those whose lives and futures are being destabilised by climate change? How might law – imperfect as it is – serve the aspirations of communities facing not just loss but the reality of being forced to move? 

Three recent legal moments in particular stand out for what they offer, and what they fail to deliver: the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (IACHR) recent advisory opinion on the climate emergency, the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) advisory opinion on climate change, and the Federal Court of Australia’s judgment in the case brought by Torres Strait Islander leaders Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai.  

Together, these decisions reveal a landscape of emerging legal principles, institutional conservatism, and the limits of legal doctrine (that is, rules that guide the interpretation of the law) when confronted with the moral urgency of climate (im)mobility. Climate mobility is the notion of those who have or will move, in whole or in part due to climate factors, while climate immobility considers the circumstances of those who cannot (or will not) move due to climate factors. 

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ advisory opinion 

The IACHR’s advisory opinion, handed down on 3 July 2025, is perhaps the most robust articulation to date of climate obligations under human rights law. Requested by Chile and Colombia, the opinion affirms that the right to a healthy environment encompasses the right to a stable climate – but the Court takes it further. It acknowledges climate change as a human rights emergency that threatens not only the rights to life, health, water and food, but also cultural integrity and self-determination. Particularly striking is the Court’s emphasis on differentiated impacts and responsibilities. It recognises that Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant communities, and small island populations face disproportionate risks, and that states must take affirmative steps to protect these communities through both mitigation and adaptation. 

Perhaps most significantly, the Court situates its reasoning within a framework of interdependence and intergenerational equity, making clear that climate protection is not merely a matter of domestic policy but a collective human obligation. It calls on states to regulate private actors – including major emitters – and to ensure that climate actions are informed by Indigenous knowledge and community participation. In this way, the advisory opinion provides a powerful normative (meaning standard-setting) resource for rights-based climate litigation and advocacy, especially in the Americas. 

Still, its legal authority is limited. As an advisory opinion, it lacks direct enforcement mechanisms. While it references the rights of cross-border climate-displaced persons, it stops short of setting out a framework for how states should concretely respond to the realities of climate-induced migration. The omission is notable. As coastal and low-lying communities in Central America and the Caribbean face rising seas and intensifying storms, the need for proactive mobility frameworks has never been greater. 

International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion on climate change 

The ICJ’s opinion, released just weeks later, similarly affirms that states have legal obligations to address climate change. Framed as a question of international law rather than human rights per se, the opinion draws on the UN Charter, customary international law, and the Paris Agreement. Contextually radical, it confirms that states have a duty to prevent significant environmental harm and to protect the rights of present and future generations. 

However, where the IACHR’s opinion is sweeping and specific, the ICJ’s is more cautious and general. While it underscores that states can be held accountable for inadequate climate action, it avoids adjudicating responsibility in relation to specific harms or state actors. Nor does it meaningfully engage with the lived experience of climate-displaced people, despite calls from Pacific Island nations to recognise the ongoing threat to their sovereignty and survival.  

The ICJ’s opinion may carry more universal legal weight, but its abstract nature does render it less accessible to those seeking immediate relief or recognition. In other words, it signifies an overarching cultural shift, but it is not an immediately accessible tool or solution for those living the realities of climate displacement today.  

Pabai Pabai v Commonwealth of Australia 

If the advisory opinions offer aspirational statements of principle, the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in the Pabai case lays bare the current distance between moral responsibility and legal redress. Filed by two community leaders from the Torres Strait Islands – and following a scathing, non-binding decision from the UN Human Rights Committee in Daniel Billy et al v Australia – the case sought to establish that the Australian government owed a duty of care to protect their homelands from the impacts of climate change. The evidence was clear: rising sea levels are already eroding ancestral lands, contaminating freshwater supplies, and threatening cultural continuity. 

Yet the court declined to recognise a novel duty of care, reasoning that such matters were questions of high government policy unsuited to judicial determination. In doing so, the judgment reaffirmed the longstanding unwillingness of common law courts to intervene in politically sensitive arenas, even where the stakes are existential. The decision acknowledged the scientific basis of the plaintiffs’ claims and the seriousness of the threat they face, but ultimately found that tort law was not the avenue through which climate justice would be achieved for this community. 

This outcome is devastating, if unsurprising. Like the Sharma case before it, Pabai reveals the structural limitations of tort-based climate litigation in jurisdictions where courts are reluctant to impose duties on the state. Yet, like the beginnings of the ICJ Advisory Opinion instigated by the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC), it highlights the resilience and innovation of Indigenous legal strategies.  

The plaintiffs have already indicated that they will appeal, and their broader campaign continues to push for legislative and political recognition of climate harm as a matter of Indigenous justice and sovereignty. 

What do these decisions, taken together, mean for climate (im)mobility? 

Taken together, these three legal developments offer a snapshot of a global legal order in flux. Advisory opinions like those from the ICJ and IACtHR may lack coercive force, but they reshape the rights-based terrain, providing tools and language for communities and advocates to press their claims. Domestic judgments, even adverse ones, can catalyse political organising and public awareness.  

As always, the law alone is not enough. It must be accompanied by a willingness to reimagine legal contemplations and redress in ways that centre the voices and knowledge of those most affected. 

For climate-affected communities, particularly Indigenous peoples whose ties to land and culture are not easily transplanted, the challenge is not only to secure recognition, but to ensure that any mobility is just, dignified, and community-led. That requires legal initiatives and frameworks that are capable of grappling with displacement, not as an unfortunate side effect, but as a central justice concern.  

As these cases show, we are not there yet. But the path is being cleared, one legal claim at a time.