Why India Needs to Prioritize Climate Adaptation Over Mitigation

Looking out towards the imposing Mehrangarh Fort in the Blue City of Jodhpur, India.

27 July 2022 – by Skand Agarwal

At COP26, India’s Prime Minister Modi announced the country’s commitment to become a net-zero carbon emitter by 2070. Alongside this, the adoption of the country’s 2022 Green Hydrogen Policy also displays further dedication to achieve this ambitious plan – including supplying up to 50% of the nation’s total energy through renewable sources by 2030.

However, despite the government’s claims of environmental action, India had become the world’s third-largest emitter of carbon dioxide by 2020 (with China and the US respectively ranked first and second).

This is especially concerning given the questions surrounding India’s capability to adapt to climate change. Several Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports have concluded that countries like India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are some of the most climate-vulnerable countries in the world. In recent years, India has experienced an increase in environmental disasters – such as cyclones, glacier melts, heat waves, floods, and more. In March 2022, the country recorded its hottest temperatures in 122 years. Some two months later, temperatures in several of India’s states had reached a new high of 49ºC (120ºF).

The Impact of Extreme Weather

The recent increase in heatwaves has already had a severe impact on the country’s economy and healthcare system, as well as its agricultural industry. In May 2022, some of the most affected areas of the country saw wheat yields drop by up to 50% – worsening the fears over a global wheat shortage related to the Russian government’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022.

What’s more, agricultural workers in the country are also facing a number of challenges. As a result of climate change, summer months are beginning earlier in the year, which can disrupt crop cycles and harvest seasons. Sporadic and prolonged summers months are also making it more difficult to predict monsoon seasons, meaning India’s farmers need to find new ways to adapt to more erratic weather patterns – or migrate to areas with more suitable growing conditions.

Farmers are not the only group of people who are affected by the earlier onset of summer. As a result of higher temperatures, an unprecedented demand for electricity (alongside a coal shortage) has led the entire population to face one of its worst electricity crises in decades. Some states such as Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Punjab are experiencing load shedding for up to eight hours per day – worsening the food crisis as many people are left unable to store refrigerated goods at home.

Rainfall levels are also becoming more unpredictable in India. For instance, the northeastern state of Assam has experienced significantly high levels of pre-monsoon rainfall, which have led to state-wide flooding. Moreover, this extreme weather caused one of the country’s major rivers, the Brahmaputra, to overflow – affecting around 500,000 people across 1,500 villages. And while India’s National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) is providing aid and support to the affected people, the sudden influx of migration to surrounding cities has undoubtedly added pressure to local administrations which we already struggling to meet demand.

But flash floods are not an uncommon phenomenon in the state of Assam. According to statistics from the Government of Assam’s Water Resources department, the region experiences three to four floods per year. Not only do these floods displace millions of people annually, they also cause extensive environmental degradation such as coastal erosion. However, despite how concerning these natural disasters are, local governments have failed to implement effective climate adaptation plans that can predict upcoming floods.

Climate Mitigation in India

In order for India to deal with these ever-worsening problems, climate mitigation strategies are essential, but the government also needs to grant equal focus to adaptation techniques. Studies indicate that it can take decades to achieve positive results from implementing climate mitigation strategies. In fact, one of the key findings of the IPCC’s sixth Assessment Report (AR6) was that between 2010 and 2019, the highest-ever levels of global greenhouse gas emissions were recorded – despite multiple international efforts to mitigate the impact of climate change since the 1990s.

This is especially concerning for India. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reported that since 1986, the Indian subcontinent has been facing an increasing number of heatwaves. What’s more, it predicts that the intensity, duration, and frequency of these heatwaves will significantly increase in the coming years.

So how is the Indian government working to mitigate and adapt to these rapidly changing climates – if at all? In 2015, India launched its National Adaptation Fund for Climate Change (NAFCC) with a budget allocation of 3.5 billion rupees (350 crores, or around US $44 million). However, research from The Indian Express found that since 2017, the grants released from the NAFCC have been steadily declining. Between 2017 and 2018, the government spent around 115 crores (around US $14.5 million), whereas between 2021 and 2022, only 27.8 crores (around US $350,000) were used to fund climate adaptation strategies.

There have been an increasing number of calls for the Indian government to implement more heatwave adaptation strategies, such as the ones enacted in the city of Ahmedabad in 2013, following on more than 1,300 deaths during a heatwave in 2010. Since the implementation of this strategy, the city has prevented around 1,100 deaths each year.

However, a significant proportion of the country’s population still remains vulnerable to the impact of climate change – particularly those who live in slum areas, as well as agricultural workers. It’s evident that death rates attributed to the effects of extreme heatwaves are still increasing. This is largely because of economic vulnerability, as day laborers and slum populations are forcibly more exposed to excessive heat levels for prolonged periods of time.

A Move Towards Mitigation

Models can be used to predict the early onset of heatwaves, including tools developed by the WMO and the India Meteorological Department (IMD). But the government still has an obligation to develop and implement more short and long-term solutions that not only protect people from climate-related health hazards, but also provide solutions that help to safeguard the livelihoods of more vulnerable communities. Moreover, these solutions should be implemented alongside community rehabilitation programs, widespread health and safety awareness campaigns, and localized economic programs across the country.

India has a varied climate; while the north faces extreme heatwaves, the northeast of the country is experiencing flash floods. These differences only serve to strengthen the case that the government needs to develop localized programs to mitigate and adapt to region-specific climate disasters.

Undoubtedly, climate mitigation is important, but it is certainly not sufficient for such a climate-diverse country like India. Findings from several IPCC reports have proven that to successfully handle issues related to climate change, both mitigation and adaptation strategies need to be implemented together. India has already heavily invested in climate mitigation, but it is now time for the country’s government to do the same with climate adaptation.

Found this article interesting? Make sure to read to read our article on how technology, policy, and social efforts are key for the future of climate change mitigation in India.


Skand Agarwal currently studies Transnational Governance, with a specialisation in climate change and environment, at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy.

Born in India, Skand has experience working with military think tanks, media houses, and in environmental activism, through which he aims to contribute to South Asia’s climate adaptability and resilience, while also advocating for the much-ignored rights of climate migrants. Skand also contributes to Earth Refuge’s Faces podcast series.


Polly Nash

As a correspondent for Earth Refuge, Polly Nash hopes to raise awareness about climate migration and give a voice to climate migrants and first responders around the world. Polly is a writer and journalist, completing her master’s degree in International Journalism at City, University of London.

Recently finishing an editorial internship at an online news and culture magazine in East London, Polly hopes to pursue a career in print journalism, with a particular focus on social issues and humanitarian reporting.

Polly completed her undergraduate degree at the University of Edinburgh, and studied abroad at UC Santa Barbara. Her love of travel has further convinced her of the vital need for a unified global response to tackle climate change and migration.

Email: [email protected]

Samantha Chinyoka

Correspondent

Samantha Chinyoka is a Renewable Energy Engineer currently working as the Projects Director for a green energy company in Zimbabwe. She holds a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy Systems from the University of Leeds, U.K.

Samantha is passionate about addressing equity and climate change through renewable-based energy transitions. She also has a keen interest in climate and energy policymaking, particularly in the role it plays in supporting low-carbon economic growth. At present, she is a member of the Global Women’s Network for the Energy Transition and youth climate action groups, the YOUNGO@UNFCCC and the UN-MGCY SDG7 Youth Constituency.

When Samantha is not working, you’ll find her volunteering for charity. She particularly enjoys mentoring young people living in institutionalised homes, helping them realise their potential, to raise their aspiration levels, and prepare them for life after the institution.

Fun fact: She has a thing for good, quality chocolate.

Email: [email protected]

Tasmin Grant

Tasmin Grant is an editor for Earth Refuge and manages the Archive: a collection of submissions that encapsulate the realities of climate migration.

She is also the Managing Editor for one of the largest global digital coffee publications, alongside studying at the London School of Journalism.

Tasmin has been working in the coffee industry for over 6 years, so while the world of climate justice is still relatively new to her, she hopes to utilise her editing skills to assist Earth Refuge with its mission of advocating for the rights of climate migrants.

When she’s not working, Tasmin enjoys discovering new music, cooking delicious vegan food, exploring London, and spending time with her beloved wife.

Email: [email protected]

Nikoleta Vasileva

Nikoleta sees over all teams as part of the strategic & organisational leadership at Earth Refuge. She sets long-term priorities and monitors their execution, while also assisting project management across departments. Having a strong international law background, Nikoleta firmly believes in the power of contemporary legal solutions and is excited about Earth Refuge’s tangible impact. 

Apart from Earth Refuge, Nikoleta works in the legal team of a global climate leadership network. She cares about making law & policy digestible and pursued this as lecturer for the European Commission and president of a diplomacy NGO. Currently, she is leading the International Institute of Space Law’s latest initiative, the Knowledge Constellation, making space law accessible for all.

Nikoleta holds an MA in Human Rights from UCL, where she was recognised in the Dean’s List for Academic Excellence. She is passionate about gender equality and appreciates great films, lyrics, fashion, and chocolate.

Email: [email protected]

Yumna Kamel

Alongside executive duties, Yumna spearheads our Legal Advocacy project –– conducting legal research for live cases featuring elements of climate migration and raising the international legal community’s awareness for the issue –– all of which sets the foundation for Earth Refuge’s future social impact litigation.

Yumna is also the Legal Education Officer at Right to Remain, where she works on resources about the UK asylum and immigration system, including the Right to Remain Toolkit. She delivers legal workshops and collaborates with asylum and migrant groups across the country.

She was called to the Bar of England & Wales in 2020 and obtained a Public Interest LLM fellowship from the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

Outside of work, Yumna (really) loves to eat, create, and talk about food. If she weren’t in the legal field, she’d be a chef.

Email: [email protected]

Lauren Grant

Director of Field Research

Lauren Grant holds an MA in Human Rights from the Legal Studies Department of Central European University and an International Human Rights Defender Certificate from the Foundations of Human Rights Protection in Constitutional and International Law postgraduate specialisation programme. She is a graduate of the Zoryan Institute’s Genocide and Human Rights University Program, and is currently pursuing an MSc in Violence, Conflict, and Development at SOAS University of London.

At Earth Refuge and beyond, Lauren’s research and advocacy spans the fields of climate-induced displacement, women’s, Indigenous and minority rights, violence, conflict, genocide, and development. In 2022, she founded the world’s first International School on Climate Migration, a five-week long summer school co-hosted by Earth Refuge and the SOAS Department of Development Studies.

In her free time, Lauren enjoys reading, diving into deep and explorative discussion over a cup of coffee, and soaking up the sunshine with her adored wife.

Email: [email protected]

Adrian Yeung

Adrian Yeung is a public policy professional based in Melbourne, Australia, and a University of Melbourne graduate with specialisations in political science, international business, and media & communications. He hopes to bring his professional experience in government, marketing, and consulting to help Earth Refuge generate awareness and build a movement around the critical issue of climate migration.
 
Outside of work, Adrian is the producer of The Story Symphony, a collaborative audio drama podcast with each chapter of the story written by an entirely different person – meaning that neither the audience nor the writers know what’s going to happen next. He also dabbles in music production, freelance writing, career mentoring, and even had a brief stint acting on community television.

Email: [email protected]

A Case for Prioritizing Empathy in Climate Change Policy

person walking on dry soil during daytime

24 July 2022 – Sara Sam-Njogu

Over the past few decades, it appears that meaningful international action towards mitigating climate change has been hard to come by. Even less ground has been covered when addressing the increasingly prevalent issues around climate migration. If no action is taken, the World Bank estimates that more than 143 million people will be displaced by 2050 – largely impacting the most marginalized and disadvantaged global communities.[1]

Climate change is defined as a “wicked problem” – so vast and complex that it seems impossible to resolve due to the multiple interdependent factors at play.[2] However, one simple overarching principle is necessary if we, as an interdependent world, are to bring about justice for those affected and displaced by climate change: empathy.

Why Should Policymakers Apply Empathy?

Applying empathy to climate change policy is a fundamental starting place [3], especially if world leaders hope to move beyond the political tug-of-war to establish long-term climate justice. Without it, they are likely to develop approaches that only benefit countries in the Global North in the short-term.[4]

There is a surprisingly simple theoretical concept that could be used by world leaders to apply empathy in their decisions on climate change policy. This concept is so intuitive that my daughters use it without any prompts. When they pull the last coveted cookie from the jar, they instinctively understand the fairness in one of them cutting the cookie while the other chooses which half to take. When she who holds the knife doesn’t know which half she will get, she is incentivized to make the split as even as possible. Cut the left side larger, and she is sure to be stuck with the smaller right side when her sister gets the first pick.

This basic concept has been the subject of the late 20th century political philosopher John Rawls, who defines it as the “original position”[5]. Rawls believed that when dealing with a specific issue, the decision maker is behind a “veil of ignorance”, because when determining the most effective path forward they are not sure which end of the policy they will ultimately be on, nor the timeframe over which the issue may occur. Cut the cookie unequally, and they could be left with  the smaller half once the veil is lifted and their position is revealed.

When it comes to climate change in particular, the veil becomes so opaque that it even obscures important external factors. This is especially true when considering the extent to which various geographical regions will be affected by climate change, despite recent advancements in scientific models which can predict these factors[6]. So how might the effects of climate change develop over time?

Looking Beyond the Veil

With these unknown issues at play, the application of Rawls’ thought experiment becomes somewhat more clear. Climate policy makers represent different countries from around the world, with some of those countries being destinations for migrants, while others are the heavily affected locations those migrants must leave behind. As they come together, these policy makers  are faced with a question they have never comprehensively addressed: under what circumstances should migrants whose own home countries have been made unlivable as a result of rising sea levels, unbearable temperatures, or drought be allowed entry into lesser-affected countries?

Immigration is a heated political topic for many countries in the Global North, including the United States [7], with policymakers facing intense scrutiny from all sides. In order to apply Rawl’s original position framework, the policymaker has to decide on an appropriate policy without truly knowing which position they will occupy – either at present or in the future. While it might seem politically desirable for the receiving country to limit climate-induced migration, the decision maker might find that once the veil is lifted, they may also be in the same position as the migrant at some point in time. Placing oneself on both sides of the situation, especially before adopting any appropriate policies, is crucial to achieving a just result.

Further complicating this dilemma are the inherent quirks within the human response of empathy. For one, humans have a tendency to worry more about today than tomorrow, even though our children will live in the tomorrow which we shape.[8] Moreover, we paradoxically feel more moved to help a single person in need, but when large groups of people are in danger, our empathy and compassion can “collapse”.[9] Ultimately, this could mean that climate change decision makers are working against their own natural impulses. They are tasked with establishing policy to protect populations in the long-term, which in the Global North can be perceived as protecting large, faceless groups of people from other parts of the world.

However, studies have shown some success in overcoming this empathy gap, mainly by viewing climate change through a political lens, as opposed to a purely scientific one.[10] This feels unsatisfying, because many believe the biggest barrier to meaningful progress is precisely a political one.[11] It is far from clear how to overcome this political will issue but the answer lies at the heart of pushing toward empathetic policy.

Undoubtedly, world leaders will always prioritize the countries they represent in these policy decisions, but all of humanity would be better served if these leaders sought out more empathy-based solutions. Although it is mostly those in the Global North who occupy habitable environments today, if the veil right in front of them is lifted, they may find that it is themselves who also need to seek a new home tomorrow.

Found this article interesting? Make sure to listen to our interview with Queer Black Feminist Alicia Wallace on the Intersectionality of Climate Change.


Sara Sam-Njogu is a second year law student at Western New England University School of Law. She is a clinician in the International Human Rights Clinic where she studies climate change, climate migration, and how corporations interact with these important issues. Prior to law school, Sara worked in sales and marketing strategy for consumer goods manufacturers. She lives in Longmeadow, MA with her husband and two daughters.


References

[1] https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2018/03/19/groundswell—preparing-for-internal-climate-migration. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[2] https://thewire.in/environment/climate-change-wicked-problem. Retrieved 10 July 2022.

[3] https://blog.oup.com/2021/07/why-climate-change-education-needs-more-empathy/. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[4] https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/10/06/how-deep-is-north-south-divide-on-climate-negotiations-pub-85493. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[5] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, John Rawls, 4.6, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/#OriPos; Davies, Ben. “John Rawls and the ‘Veil of Ignorance.’” In INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS: AN OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE, 92–97. Golden West College, Huntington Beach, CA: NGE Far Press, 2019, https://open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/john-rawls-and-the-veil-of-ignorance/. Retrieved 10 July 2022.

[6] https://aambpublicoceanservice.blob.core.windows.net/oceanserviceprod/education/pd/climate/factsheets/howreliable.pdf. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[7] https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-immigration-debate-0. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[8] https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/08/22/caring-about-tomorrow/. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[9] https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/10/indonesia-tsunami-compassion-collapse/572431/. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[10] https://www.elevatescientific.com/time-to-move-on-from-the-information-deficit-model/. Retrieved 12 April 2022.

[11] https://time.com/6165094/ipcc-climate-action-political-will/. Retrieved 10 July 2022.

David Cremins

David is a student at Stanford Law School in Palo Alto, California, passionate about anything at the intersection of migration, workers’ rights, and climate justice. He has worked in tech, asylum law, and, in the summer of 2022 with Centro de los Derechos del Migrante, a migrant workers’ rights organization. With Earth Refuge, he writes, edits, and publishes case summaries for the Legal Database. David loves being part of this international, intersectional team and hopes to meet some of his collaborators someday!

Email: [email protected]